Gioshvile v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform


Gioshvilli
Respondent/Defendant:Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
Court/s:High Court
Citation/s:Unreported
Judgment Date/s:31 Jan 2003
Judge:Finlay Geoghegan
Category:Refugee Law
Keywords:Country of Origin (Safe), Refugee, Refugee Law, Refugee Status, Third Country (Safe)
Country of Origin:Georgia

The Applicant left Georgia in 1989, lived in Russia until 1999 and subsequently sought asylum in Ireland. The Refugee Applications Commissioner, in determining his claim, stated that Russia might have amounted to a safe third country. The applicant appealed to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal. The Tribunal concluded that the applicant’s fear of persecution in Russia was not well grounded. The applicant challenged this decision by way of judicial review.

The High Court held that there were substantial grounds for the contention that refugees are not obliged to seek asylum in the first available safe country to which they flee and that the Tribunal was not entitled to take into account the circumstances of the applicant’s departure from Russia into account as matters relating to his departure from a State other than that of which he was a national can only be considered where the applicant has no nationality.

Principles:It is arguable that refugees are not obliged to seek asylum in the first available safe country to which they flee. It is arguable that the circumstances of an applicant’s departure from a State other than that of which he is a national are not relevant where an applicant has a country of origin or habitual residence.
Go Back