Facts: KS, MHK, RAT and DS applied for international protection in Ireland between 2015 and 2018. They were subsequently issued with transfer decisions to other Member States pursuant to the Dublin III Regulation 604/2013, which they appealed. In the interim, all four applicants had been refused permission to access the labour market due to the exclusion of persons in Dublin … Read More
KS and MHK v International Protection Appeals Tribunal, the Minister for Justice and Equality and the Advocate General and RAT and DS v Minister for Justice and Equality (Joined Cases C-322/19 and C-385/19)
KS and others v International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Minister for Justice and Equality and others
| Respondent/Defendant: | Minister for Justice and Equality, Advocate General and the International Protection Appeals Tribunal |
| Court/s: | Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) |
| Citation/s: | ECLI:EU:C:2021:11 |
| Nature of Proceedings: | Preliminary Reference |
| Judgment Date/s: | 14 Jan 2021 |
| Judge: | Piçarra N (Rapporteur) |
| Category: | Refugee Law |
| Keywords: | Asylum, Common European Asylum System (CEAS), Dublin Regulation, Employment, Reception Conditions, Refugee Law |
| Country of Origin: | Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq |
| URL: | http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=236427&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=1675215 |
| Principles: | - Where a national court is interpreting provisions of the recast Reception Conditions Directive, account must be taken of the recast Asylum Procedures Directive, even where the Member State has not opted into that legislation. |