Facts: The appellant was a national of Nigeria. He submitted an application for international protection in 2016, which was unsuccessful. The appellant was informed that an International Protection Officer (IPO) had recommended he not be granted refugee status or subsidiary protection pursuant to section 39 of the International Protection Act 2015. He was subsequently informed that the Minister for Justice … Read More
A.S.A. v Minister for Justice and Equality
ASA v Minister for Justice and Equality
Respondent/Defendant: | Minister for Justice and Equality |
Court/s: | High Court, Supreme Court |
Nature of Proceedings: | Judicial Review |
Judgment Date/s: | 24 Nov 2022 |
Judge: | MacMenamin J. |
Category: | Asylum, Refugee Law |
Keywords: | Asylum Applicant, Carltona Principle, Deportation, Leave to Remain, Protection (International), Return |
Country of Origin: | Nigeria |
URL: | www.courts.ie/view/judgments/b76af74a-fd59-4100-9a63-31b836b1eeed/de05c437-f17e-47ad-a7d9-893981bb5f42/2022_IESC_49.pdf/pdf |
Principles: | There is no conflict of roles or functions exists between an international protection officer in their role in the international protection procedure, and an officer of the Minister in their role in permission to remain decisions under section 49 of the 2015 Act. |