Facts:The applicant was a citizen of Pakistan who arrived in Ireland in 2010 and applied for asylum. He claimed to be an Ahmadi Muslim and to have suffered persecution there on account of his religious beliefs, having been targeted by a man who was a follower of a hardline Sunni group who wanted to take his money and land. He … Read More
PIMK (Pakistan) v Refugee Appeals Tribunal, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland and the Attorney General
| Respondent/Defendant: | Refugee Appeals Tribunal, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland and the Attorney General |
| Court/s: | High Court |
| Citation/s: | [2014] IEHC 535 |
| Nature of Proceedings: | Judicial Review |
| Judgment Date/s: | 25 Nov 2014 |
| Judge: | Eagar J. |
| Category: | Refugee Law |
| Keywords: | Asylum, Asylum (Application for), Persecution, Refoulement (Non-), Refugee, Refugee Law |
| Country of Origin: | Pakistan |
| URL: | http://www.courts.ie/Judgments.nsf/0/ECC98E5F7D0F73A580257DB10043287C |
| Geographic Focus: | Ireland |
| Principles: | Where a protection decision-maker expresses clear reasons in a decision for refusing an application for protection, the court has no entitlement to substitute its decision for that of the decision-maker in any judicial review of the decision. |