SO v Refugee Appeals Tribunal

adminLeave a Comment

Respondent/Defendant:Refugee Appeals Tribunal
Court/s:High Court
Citation/s:[2017] IEHC 255
Nature of Proceedings:Judicial Review
Judgment Date/s:27 Apr 2017
Judge:Keane D.
Category:Refugee Law
Keywords:Protection (International), Refugee, Refugee Law
Country of Origin:Guinea
Geographic Focus:Other


The applicant was a Guinean national who applied for refugee status in the State. She claimed to have worked as a secretary in the accounting/finance department of the Guinean National Assembly, and that she fled Guinea after a military coup fearing persecution. Her application was refused at first instance and on appeal. Although the Tribunal accepted her general credibility, it was not satisfied she had established a Convention nexus linking her fear of persecution to one of the five Convention grounds. The applicant instituted judicial review proceedings challenging the decision of the Tribunal.


The High Court quashed the decision of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, holding that the Tribunal had erred in law in refusing the applicant’s appeal because there was no evidence that people in a similar position to the applicant had faced persecution after the coup. The High Court noted that the applicant’s case was based on the fact that she held a unique position, and that the Tribunal had therefore misdirected itself in law.


Refusal of refugee status quashed.


This decision provides guidance to protection decision-makers dealing with claims based on imputed political opinion and the correct approach to risk assessment in such cases.

Go Back

Leave a Reply